|
Post by jeffan on Dec 17, 2008 6:24:45 GMT -5
BEST ACTOR WATCH: Jeff Goldblum in ‘Adam Resurrected’ Posted by Guy Lodge · 11:03 am · September 5th, 2008
Looking at the latest contenders to muscle in on an already crowded Best Actor field, you could be forgiven for thinking it’s 1986 or something.
First, the formerly washed-up Mickey Rourke rebounds with an apparently career-best performance in “The Wrestler” that is generating loud Oscar buzz.
Now Rourke’s relative contemporary, Jeff Goldblum, is setting tongues wagging for another indie effort, albeit one with a much lower profile going in. As Holocaust survivor Adam Steiner in “Adam Resurrected,” the latest film from the ever-underrated Paul Schrader, Goldblum is attracting the kind of attention he hasn’t seen since, well, his career-making performance in “The Fly.”
Writing from Telluride, where the film bowed, Cinematical’s Kim Voynar began beating the drum:
Goldblum’s performance as Adam is complex and engrossing to watch, and while I can’t begin to fathom what it must have taken out of him to get inside this story and character to pull the performance off at this level, it’s truly a wonder to behold onscreen. The Oscar buzz circulating Goldblum’s turn in this film is far from hype; he educes the death and rebirth of a man’s soul in such a way that I’d be hard pressed to compare it to anything I’ve ever seen onscreen.
Variety’s Todd McCarthy is left pretty cold by the whole affair, but he doesn’t deny Goldblum’s achievement. He calls the performance “a genuine tour de force,” even if he is concerned that viewers might not find a way in:
One can tremendously admire Goldblum’s quicksilver performance without being engaged by it; even before the war, Stein seems unlike other people, and after liberation, his humanity has vanished. He’s an exceptional character, and Goldblum has reckoned with it better than audiences are likely to.
Elsewhere, in their Telluride wrap-up, The Wall Street Journal deems him “nothing short of dazzling,” one of several similar pronouncements doing the rounds.
In terms of Oscar prospects, Goldblum’s biggest obstacle appears to be his own film — by all accounts, it’s a challenging, eccentric work with limited audience appeal, and the reviews have been decidedly mixed. (Nothing surprising there — it’s a Paul Schrader film, after all.)
In his favour, however, it’s no secret that Holocaust films frequently hit a nerve with Academy voters — cue those unlikely victories in recent years for Adrien Brody and Robert Benigni. And Goldblum is one of those long-serving, consistently interesting actors whose lack of awards recognition to date is something of a surprise. (He was robbed for “The Fly,” in my opinion, but the Academy, circa 1986, was nowhere near ready for that.)
As with the Best Actress competition, a number of previously unhailed contenders from the independent sector are now crowding the Best Actor field — including Goldblum, Rourke and early critical favourite Richard Jenkins. How many of them will go the distance remains to be seen, but it’s clear that the big guns — from Langella to Pitt, Penn to DiCaprio — will have to be on top form to outpace the little guys.
|
|
|
Post by jeffan on Jan 2, 2009 6:42:49 GMT -5
It's Raining Men: Which Men Should Get Oscar Nods ... and Which Men Shouldn't
This week, we only asked our Gurus to vote on Best Picture, but as the resident Oscar outsider, I'm still working my way up to that category. I've delved deeply into the various adapted screenplays I was most interested in, and have covered the women quite extensively, so this week I'm focusing my mental energies on a topic I've been neglecting: the men. And just to clarify up front: this is a discussion of who I think most deserves to be nominated for the Best Supporting Actor and Best Actor categories, not who I think the Academy, in all its collective wisdom, is likely to put there. There are others who are far better at playing the Oscar ponies than I am, and I'll let them have at that game; meanwhile, I offer you the following thoughts on which actors most deserve a shot at going home on Oscar night with a naked golden man in their arms.
Best Supporting Actor The actor who most deserves to be in the running for Best Supporting and isn't (or at least, isn't perceived to be) is Eddie Marsan for his searing performance as Scott, the angry driving instructor in Mike Leigh's Happy-Go-Lucky. Marsan's acerbity as Scott provides the perfect counterbalance to Sally Hawkin's chipper, charming performance as Poppy, the primary school teacher with the heart of gold. A strong supporting performance is more than just the talent the actor brings to the screen; it's about how that role impacts the overall film in a meaningful way. Without Marsan to bring the thunderclouds to Poppy's sunny day, there would be little conflict or reason for Poppy to go down the subtle paths of introspection she travels in the film. Every scene with Scott and Poppy in that car together is flawlessly timed and executed, Marsan and Hawkins play off each other expertly, and the penultimate blow-up scene near the end is startling in its ferocity, coming as it does in an otherwise light-hearted film. Marsan's performance brings exactly the right notes of discord to the film to make it interesting and engaging, and it's surprising that, for all the critical love Marsan has gotten for his performance, he's not getting pushed for an Oscar.
I get that Miramax is in a bit of a spot here, with both Happy-Go-Lucky and Doubt in contention for Oscars, and that given the names of the talent involved, they're focusing their energy more on Doubt. But I strongly disagree with Philip Seymour Hoffman (much as I like him both generally and in Doubt) being in contention for a Best Supporting Actor Oscar for what's clearly the lead male performance in a film. Marsan's supporting performance is outstanding, and while he'd be up against tough competition in Heath Ledger, the clear front-runner, he deserves a shot at the gold.
Another performance getting overlooked in Best Supporting Actor category is George Clooney as Harry Pfarrer in the Coen brothers' Burn After Reading. I'm really at a loss as to why Burn After Reading has gotten such a lukewarm response from the critical community; for me, it's one of the Coen's best darkly comedic films, and I suspect that if it wasn't for the excellent No Country for Old Men making such a strong showing last year, response to Burn After Reading might have been very different. Perhaps the ensemble nature of the film has hurt the chances of any one or two players to be noticed for some Oscar love, but Clooney is at the top of his comedic game here. The scene right after his Harry Pfarrer surprises Brad Pitt's affable doofus Chad hiding in the closet is, in and of itself, a perfectly timed, darkly comedic gem; combined with his performance overall, he should be right up there in the running, not off the charts altogether. I get that Oscar prognosticators and Academy voters tend to lean more heavily towards drama than comedy -- which I always find a bit befuddling, as I think strong, smart comedy is much harder to write than strong drama -- but Burn After Reading has a talented ensemble cast at top form, and Clooney in particular should be a stronger contender than he is at the moment.
Lastly in the Best Supporting Actor category, there's another strong supporting male performance that's being greatly overlooked as we head closer to Oscar: Liev Schreiber's excellent turn as Zus Bielski opposite Daniel Craig as Zus's older brother, Tuvia, in Ed Zwick's Defiance. Schreiber has been tearing up the stage for years now, taking home a Tony award in the revival of David Mamet's Glengarry Glen Ross, but he's not found an on-screen role big enough for all that talent -- until the role of Zus. All Schreiber's fiery passion and considerable talent are poured into this role, and he's the perfect foil to Craig's Tuvia. The real-life paths the brothers took provides a great dramatic structure for the film: Where Tuvia opts to fight the Germans by saving as many Jews as possible through armed resistance, Zus chooses to abandon the Bielski partisans for a, while to go join the Russian army and kill as many Germans as possible. Schreiber was ideally cast as Zus, and his performance is largely what drives the film. It's well worth consideration for Oscar gold, and I hope the Academy voters will recognize it.
Best Actor Much of the talk in the Best Actor category has focused on the battle between Sean Penn for Milk versus Mickey Rourke for The Wrestler. While both actors turn in fine performances worthy of consideration, Richard Jenkins' excellent turn in The Visitor, a small, quiet, expertly crafted film, has gone largely unnoticed by Oscar prognosticators. Jenkins plays Walter, a sad-sack college professor mired in depression and the routine of teaching the same class with the same syllabus for years while ostensibly working on his latest book. When Walter has to go to New York City to present a paper he co-authored, but really knows nothing about, he goes to his long-empty city apartment to find it occupied by Tarek and Zairab, a young immigrant couple. As Walter gets to know Tarek and Zairab, and Tarek introduces the buttoned-up Walter to the joys of drumming, Walter slowly comes out of his shell and finds a whole world he'd shut himself off from opening up to him again.
Jenkins' performance as Frances McDormand's boss in Burn After Reading has garnered more critical buzz, but excellent though he is in the Coens' film, his finely tuned performance in The Visitor carries the film, and he deserves an Oscar nod for this role.
Another male lead performance I'm surprised isn't getting more Osar buzz is Benecio del Toro's role as Che Guevara in Steven Soderbergh's epic film Che. As the iconic revolutionary figure whose face launched a thousand t-shirts, del Toro drives the film through its four-and-a-half hour running time; regardless of what you think of the politics of Che Guevara, del Toro is fantastic in the role, bringing the son-of-privilege-turned-revolutionary-hero (or villain, depending on your perspective) to life in a remarkable performance that, to my mind, is head-and-shoulders above many of the other roles vying for the five Best Actor slots.
Also getting rather lost in the shuffle is Brad Pitt's lead performance in David Fincher's The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, which looks like it may get overlooked in the wash of talk about the film's technical achievements in creating a lead character who's born an old man and ages backwards. Underneath all that makeup and CGI magic, though, is Pitt's nuanced portrayal of Benjamin, who struggles to find his place in a world where he's both old and young. I've sat on writing about this film since I saw it, because it offered so many things to ponder, not the least of which is Pitt's performance, which is among his best ever in a career of strong, largely overlooked lead roles.
Fincher, when he spoke about Pitt at the Telluride Film Festival following a screening of 20 minutes of Benjamin Button clips, talked about how he loves working with Pitt because people tend to get so caught up in Pitt's movie-stardom and personal life that they forget what a talented actor he is underneath all that glitz, glamour and gossip. In movie after movie, Pitt consistently brings his talent to the table, and he's only been nominated for an Oscar once, way back in 1996, for Twelve Monkeys. It's high time Pitt got some recognition for his work from the Academy, and The Curious Case of Benjamin Button seems the perfect vehicle for him to earn his second Oscar nom and a shot at Oscar gold.
Lastly in the Best Actor category is a career-high performance by Jeff Goldblum in the high-minded Adam Resurrected. Adam Resurrected is not an easy film to watch; like director Paul Schrader's Mishima, it's an abstract piece of filmmaking, filled with symbolism and bizarre moments, but it stays with you, and its brilliance resonates throughout, bolstered strongly by Goldblum's fascinating performance as Adam. This is one of those rare films where the performance itself is so great that the film is worth seeing even if you're not a fan of Schrader's directorial style; I can't imagine anyone but Goldblum pulling off this role in the way he has here. Goldblum was great last year in Fay Grim, Hal Hartley's follow-up to Henry Fool (one of my favorite films ever) as a slick CIA guy, but his turn in Adam Resurrected completely knocked my socks off and left me reeling for days.
At the moment, MCNs Gurus have two actors sitting above Jenkins, del Toro, Pitt and Goldblum in the Best Actor category who, in a perfect world, would not be in the running compared to any of these performances. Leonardo DiCaprio, as Frank Wheeler in Revolutionary Road, does an able-enough job given what he had to work with, but the material was so flawed that it largely detracts from what his performance could have -- and should have -- been. Frank Wheeler is a complex literary character, a man so completely lacking in self-awareness that his life would be be a comedy, had author Richard Yates not chose to frame this story as a tragedy. Frank, as written by Yates, has layers and layers of emotional complexity which the author constantly peels back and reveals to the reader; Frank, as written by screenwriter Justin Haythe and filmed by Sam Mendes, is confusing without being complex, emotionally distant without rhyme or reason, and lacks the distinct intellectual manipulation of reality that made Frank Wheeler such a fascinating literary character. DiCaprio does an able-enough job bringing Frank Wheeler to life, but because the material is lacking the heart and soul of what made both Frank Wheeler and his wife, April (Kate Winslet) tick, he's not able to fully flesh Frank out as he should be; it's not entirely DiCaprio's fault, but neither the role nor the performance, in this case, is worthy of an Oscar nod.
Neither is Clint Eastwood's retro performance in Gran Torino, in which he recycles his "Dirty" Harry Callahan persona and slaps him into the structure of another story in which he's called Walt Kowalski. I like Eastwood as much as the next person, but there's just nothing new or spectacular in this performance to warrant an Oscar nod. I get that he's getting up there in years, and he's never won an acting Oscar, but this performance just doesn't stand up when compared to the stronger performances by Jenkins, del Toro, Pitt and Goldblum, much less Penn and Rourke; the Best Actor slots should go to the strongest male lead performances of the year, and Eastwood in Gran Torino just isn't at that level of greatness. And while I liked both Sean Penn in Milk and Mickey Rourke in The Wrestler, the former performance is a strong turn amid a bevy of equally strong ensemble performances, whereas the latter role almost completely defines the film, so I'm giving more weight to Rourke than Penn for a Best Actor berth.
With all that said, here, for your own consideration, are the actors I think are most deserving of the five slots in Best Actor and Best Supporting Actor (in alphabetical order):
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR George Clooney, Burn After Reading Heath Ledger, The Dark Knight Eddie Marsan, Happy-Go-Lucky Liev Schreiber, Defiance Michael Shannon, Revolutionary Road
BEST ACTOR Jeff Goldblum, Adam Resurrected Richard Jenkins, The Visitor Benecio del Toro, Che Brad Pitt, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button Mickey Rourke, The Wrestler
by Kim Voynar 12/31/08
Previous Oscar Outsiders
12/24 - Defining a Dramatic Structure for Defiance 12/17 - Consider the Source: The Adaptation of Revolutionary Road 12/10 - And the Nominees for Best Actress Should Be ... 12/03 - Docs: Poetry Vs Prose 11/26 - Considering the Best Picture Oscar Contenders 11/19 - Simon Beaufoy's Adaptation of Slumdog Millionaire 11/12 - Oscar and the Absence of Femme Films 10/20 - This Year's Little Engine That Could 10/13 - For My Consideration
2008. Movie City News, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
|
Post by caitlen on Jan 2, 2009 7:25:15 GMT -5
Thanks for the article
|
|
ZackNicholsgirl
Detective
I love both doggies and kitties. I could just scrunch up their cute little faces! - Jeff Goldblum
Posts: 423
|
Post by ZackNicholsgirl on Jan 2, 2009 16:06:10 GMT -5
Flavor of Sex!
|
|
|
Post by caitlen on Jan 6, 2009 6:28:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by jeffan on Jan 9, 2009 17:28:36 GMT -5
Friday, January 9, 2009 Bleiberg sees Oscar for Goldblum Distributor launches campaign for 'Adam' star By MICHAEL JONES
While self-distribution is usually the last resort for indie film, the producers of "Adam Resurrected" have gone a step further. Not content with a simple specialty release, they're paying handsomely for an Oscar campaign around star Jeff Goldblum. Paul Schrader directed the adaptation of Yoram Kaniuk's novel about a former circus performer and Holocaust survivor stuck in an Israeli mental institution.
While Goldblum's perf was hailed at the Telluride, Toronto and Mill Valley film fests, producer Ehud Bleiberg didn't like the offers they were getting -- namely the proposed release dates. Distribs told him they had too much kudos bait already.
"Why would we screen the film at Telluride and Toronto and release it a year later?" Bleiberg asks.
Bleiberg is no stranger to Oscar nom drama. His last film -- the Israeli hit "The Band's Visit" --seemingly auto-qualified for Oscar consideration after winning the top Israeli Film Academy award. It was later disqualified for having too much English in it.
With "Adam Resurrected," he got a lot of advice from high-profile admirers, including George Lucas, to go DIY. So Bleiberg and co-producer 3L Filmproduktion have committed "a substantial amount" to the pic's award campaign for a shot at best actor.
Full-page ads, 20-plus screenings in N.Y. and L.A., plus 5,000 screeners have been the first salvo, with more to come, Bleiberg promises.
In March, he'll release the pic himself, accompanied, he hopes, by a little Oscar heat.
"There are hardly any specialty companies in L.A. anymore," he says. "We have no choice to but to take our destiny in our own hands."
|
|
|
Post by jeffan on Jan 24, 2009 12:37:19 GMT -5
For those of you who do not already know, Jeff was not nominated for an Oscar for his performance in Adam Resurrected. Best Actor Nominations 2009Richard Jenkins - The Visitor Frank Langella - Frost/Nixon Sean Penn - Milk Brad Pitt - The Curious Case of Benjamin Button Mickey Rourke - The Wrestler Just JaredJan 22, 2009. justjared.buzznet.com/2009/01/22/oscar-nominations-2009-list/.
|
|
|
Post by DonnaJo on Jan 24, 2009 14:32:06 GMT -5
I'm very sorry, jeffan, blum baby & the rest of you Goldblum fans. We VDO fans feel your pain, since VDO has never been nominated for an Oscar, Golden Globe or Emmy.
You know how these things are. I just hope that Mickey Rourke wins. Or Frank Langella, who like Jeff, has always been under rated.
|
|
ZackNicholsgirl
Detective
I love both doggies and kitties. I could just scrunch up their cute little faces! - Jeff Goldblum
Posts: 423
|
Post by ZackNicholsgirl on Jan 24, 2009 14:46:44 GMT -5
Yea I know how those things are.. Hollywood doesn't know anymore about real Talents. That is sad but it's the truth!
Anyway, In my heart I know the Blum is the best.. He doesn't need of a 13 1/2 Inches oscar statuette to convince me.. His 7 Inches Convinced me XD
|
|
|
Post by tjara on Jan 24, 2009 16:31:34 GMT -5
It's always sad that some films/stars get underrated - because it's not just the performance itself, but also who else/what else is up that same year... some years there's not that many good films... and in others, there's many good films... so in my oppinion, the Oscars don't say much. Just look back at what movies have gotten the Best Picture Oscar over the last 80 years - and how many of them are even still considered "classic" and how many of them have been forgotten... Just think about how many actors have gotten multiple nominations, but never have gotten the award... or how many have multiple nominations, but only one or two Oscars. I think Meryl Streep has like 14 nominations, but only 1 or 2 Oscars? Or how some actors receive an award for a certain role that's not nearly half as good as their next role? (I think Russel Crowe would've much more deserved the Oscar for A beautiful Mind than for Gladiator).
Hey, but Renee Zellweger thanked him in her speech when she received an Oscar of "Best Actress in a supporting role" for Brokeback Mountain. I acutally thought that was very sweet, because she said something like that he taught her how to act. That's a huge compliment...
|
|
|
Post by jeffan on Jan 24, 2009 16:45:07 GMT -5
Posted by DonnaJo on Today at 2:32pm I'm very sorry, jeffan, blum baby & the rest of you Goldblum fans. We VDO fans feel your pain, since VDO has never been nominated for an Oscar, Golden Globe or Emmy.
You know how these things are. I just hope that Mickey Rourke wins. Or Frank Langella, who like Jeff, has always been under rated.
Thank you DJ for your kind words and thoughts. JF
|
|
|
Post by jeffan on Jan 24, 2009 16:58:17 GMT -5
tjara, Rene won her Oscar for Cold Mountain! I personally think she should have won an Oscar for her performance in The Whole Wide World!
To get back to Jeff, que sera sera
|
|
|
Post by tjara on Jan 24, 2009 17:06:31 GMT -5
Oh whatever, some mountain!! No, seriously, thanks for setting me straight. Shall not again attempt to eat, type, pet cat and think all at once again. *chuckles*
|
|
|
Post by dragonsback on Jan 24, 2009 17:53:08 GMT -5
Commiserations to all the lovely blummies on the Oscar/Globes miss, but look, missing the final list isn't even an itty-bitty slight of JG. The man personally received almost unanimous raves from all over the press world, from Variety to the sniffy Wall Street Journal. Take it as some reviewers did, a comment on the difficult and possibly not easily digested or likable nature of the movie itself. I quote from a reviewer above: " Goldblum’s biggest obstacle appears to be his own film".
That said, the showers of praise poured over his personal performance makes him a real winner, not just to fans but to the powerful movers and shakers within the profession. And how rewarding it must be for him, personally and career-wise, to have invested himself so deeply in a project and be recognised with such thunderous applause from the critics' circle.
|
|
ZackNicholsgirl
Detective
I love both doggies and kitties. I could just scrunch up their cute little faces! - Jeff Goldblum
Posts: 423
|
Post by ZackNicholsgirl on Jan 25, 2009 3:32:04 GMT -5
Well Said Dragonsback!
|
|