Post by Patcat on Feb 27, 2009 9:41:09 GMT -5
Will air March 2 at 2pm (EST) and March 3 at 1am (EST) on the USA Network. First aired October 28, 2001. Sixth Episode of Season One.
Written by Marlane Gomard Meyer
Directed by Jean de Segonzac
Guest Actors: Eric Thal as Didier Foucault (Denis DuPont)
Terry Serpico as Leslie Roche (Mr. Serpico would also appear in BUT NOT FORGOTTEN)
Synopsis: Enforcers, conned rich people, and mistaken identities lead Goren and Eames to an accomplished con man.
Quotes:
Eames: "You'd think Trump's secretary would use spell check."
Goren: "You have one chance to take your chestnuts out of the fire."
Carver: "Charge them for a murder they didn't commit? Of a person who isn't dead? I can't begin to count the number of violations that would entail."
Goren: "Ten to one he'll call back. He has something to prove to me now."
Carver: "Ten to one?"
Eames: "I've taken him on before, Mr. Carver. I'm down eighteen bucks."
Goren: "Someone to teach you to ride a bike. Two people to think you're special. It makes a difference."
Carver: "Some people get by on a lot less."
Goren: "They shouldn't have to."
Queries:
Can we hope that all these rich people are really suffering right now?
Does the victim got lost in this one? Come to that, who is the victim?
Who is Felix Perez? Is he on his way to becoming another Didier?
Why didn't the ME or others discover the body was Perez and not Didier? Would this have been discovered eventually?
With his picture appearing everywhere, wouldn't someone have recognized Didier?
Is the reporter Tom Santini a friend of Bobby's? Why don't we see him again?
Is Bobby's use of the press unethical?
Does Bobby know how to play Didier because of Bobby's own experiences? Does Bobby feel sympathy for Didier?
Didier is supposed to be charming, but do we see any of that?
The Case of the Disappearing Eames--This episode begins with Eames and Goren working closely and well together. Kathryn Erbe has a particularly wonderful moment when she looks back at Goren after Mrs. Blackstone calmly reveals Didier was her lover. But Eames disappears from the story in the last third of the episode, and it seems that Goren works a lot of this case by himself. He also has several extended conversations with Carver. Did anyone else notice this?
Comments: An episode with an intriguing antagonist and some fine moments. Goren and Eames work especially well together. Eames, Deakins and even Carver get some nice snarky lines. There's several scenes that give the audience a nice view of the physical layout of the Major Case Squad. Goren gets to play telephone and newspaper chess with his opponent. But (and you knew there was a "but" coming, didn't you?) something seems lacking in this episode. I think the problem may be in the writing or the acting of Didier Foucalt. Didier is supposed to be this extremely charming character--we're told this over and over again, and he certainly had to have something in order to pull off his cons. But we never get to see this charm, and Eric Thal's performance seems flat to me. Mr. Thal is, even in that license photo, handsome enough, but there's no spark to his performance. But perhaps he didn't have enough to work with? Opinions?
Submitted for you consideration and comments.
Patcat
Written by Marlane Gomard Meyer
Directed by Jean de Segonzac
Guest Actors: Eric Thal as Didier Foucault (Denis DuPont)
Terry Serpico as Leslie Roche (Mr. Serpico would also appear in BUT NOT FORGOTTEN)
Synopsis: Enforcers, conned rich people, and mistaken identities lead Goren and Eames to an accomplished con man.
Quotes:
Eames: "You'd think Trump's secretary would use spell check."
Goren: "You have one chance to take your chestnuts out of the fire."
Carver: "Charge them for a murder they didn't commit? Of a person who isn't dead? I can't begin to count the number of violations that would entail."
Goren: "Ten to one he'll call back. He has something to prove to me now."
Carver: "Ten to one?"
Eames: "I've taken him on before, Mr. Carver. I'm down eighteen bucks."
Goren: "Someone to teach you to ride a bike. Two people to think you're special. It makes a difference."
Carver: "Some people get by on a lot less."
Goren: "They shouldn't have to."
Queries:
Can we hope that all these rich people are really suffering right now?
Does the victim got lost in this one? Come to that, who is the victim?
Who is Felix Perez? Is he on his way to becoming another Didier?
Why didn't the ME or others discover the body was Perez and not Didier? Would this have been discovered eventually?
With his picture appearing everywhere, wouldn't someone have recognized Didier?
Is the reporter Tom Santini a friend of Bobby's? Why don't we see him again?
Is Bobby's use of the press unethical?
Does Bobby know how to play Didier because of Bobby's own experiences? Does Bobby feel sympathy for Didier?
Didier is supposed to be charming, but do we see any of that?
The Case of the Disappearing Eames--This episode begins with Eames and Goren working closely and well together. Kathryn Erbe has a particularly wonderful moment when she looks back at Goren after Mrs. Blackstone calmly reveals Didier was her lover. But Eames disappears from the story in the last third of the episode, and it seems that Goren works a lot of this case by himself. He also has several extended conversations with Carver. Did anyone else notice this?
Comments: An episode with an intriguing antagonist and some fine moments. Goren and Eames work especially well together. Eames, Deakins and even Carver get some nice snarky lines. There's several scenes that give the audience a nice view of the physical layout of the Major Case Squad. Goren gets to play telephone and newspaper chess with his opponent. But (and you knew there was a "but" coming, didn't you?) something seems lacking in this episode. I think the problem may be in the writing or the acting of Didier Foucalt. Didier is supposed to be this extremely charming character--we're told this over and over again, and he certainly had to have something in order to pull off his cons. But we never get to see this charm, and Eric Thal's performance seems flat to me. Mr. Thal is, even in that license photo, handsome enough, but there's no spark to his performance. But perhaps he didn't have enough to work with? Opinions?
Submitted for you consideration and comments.
Patcat