Post by Sirenna on Sept 19, 2004 18:58:43 GMT -5
Experts Analyzed
By Kitteridge
Few shows rely on police and legal accuracy like Law & Order does, which means they need to ask experts in the field when it comes time to get down to the nitty gritty. Mike Struk, a former NYPD homicide and narcotics detective for 20 years, is their man, and he's been with the show since its first episode, all the way back. Currently, he runs a private detective agency in New Jersey, but as he tells apocrypha, he's always got his beeper set to "on," in case of emergencies. apocrypha sat down with L&O's police advisor and got down to details pretty fast.
Is there more than one police advisor for the show?
No, I'm the official guy. I've been with the show since the very first episode. I've done the whole thing with them. I'm retired from the NYPD, I was a detective in New York City, through various assignments -- narcotics and homicide squad, etcetera.
How many years?
Twenty years to the minute.
You got out as soon as you could!
(laughs) I was standing there when the clock hit 12.
Twenty years is enough?
Oh, yeah. It was fun, I had a great, great time, but I was young enough to start over and not many people have the opportunity to retire at 41, so I thought, 'Let me go take a shot.'
And how did you get involved with L&O in the first place?
One of the writers [David Black] brought me to the show -- he had written a book on a major murder case I was involved in in July of 1980. I don't know if you remember the Met Murder case -- it had a great amount of notoriety. It was a violinist who got grabbed backstage at the Metropolitan Opera, and we had about four or five weeks to solve the case, and it was a situation where the gal had been pulled into the bowels of the building by a stagehand and thrown off the roof, and it was carried front page on the [New York] Times for a while.
And that's rare -- usually they don't put that smut on the front page, at least not that often. So he wrote a book for myself and this other detective, and I guess you could say maybe his first book was the exposure, and he was a gentleman. It kind of opened the doors for him, and he went on to do some writing for Hill Street Blues, Miami Vice and a lot of other projects since then. And he came on board to Law & Order and he was brought on in the initial crew as a writer, and he brought me on.
Not a bad second career.
Yeah, I'm not driving a Porsche, but it's been great fun.
When you first started early on, how much did you contribute to the actual authenticity of the show?
Well, probably in a greater way than I am today because a lot of the writers today are seasoned hairbags themselves. I feel like some of them are detectives I worked with in the homicide squad. They were just making many many scripts early on, and grooming the script was quite a job. Although a lot of them did a lot of research and spoke to peripheral people, but to enhance the script or to the get the script better early on was a lot of work early on, and now they've all developed writing styles and things are in place and it's a lot easier for me today.
Can you think of an example early on of something they missed that you made sure you had fixed?
To think of one specific thing that makes me laugh -- everything from how to wear a gun to why to wear a gun to how many guns to why to arrest people and you name it. Just picture yourself as the layman, writing a story about police officers and the law and the rules and the regulations they have to adhere to. It's just not that easy, whether you're a writer or not.
How important was it and is it to the show to get that kind of thing right?
I can only speculate and speak from my own experience, but I currently run a small investigations business, and it brings me -- I wouldn't say throughout the world, but I have traveled in other countries and throughout the United States and of course all over the Eastern seaboard, and my job brings me into many municipalities and police stations and prosecutors' offices and usually my test for the show is after I've done business with these people and have an opportunity to say near the end of whatever my business was, "By the way, did you guys ever see Law & Order?"
And I would come out right from the blue, and nobody knows I had anything to do with it, and really solicit honest opinions from people. And 97--98% of the comments over all these years have always been genuinely upbeat for the show. And I'd hear, "That's a pretty good show, it's close, it's kind of like the real thing," and then I would tell them, don't forget, it is a commercial product, and if they told it exactly like it was, we'd all be snoring. So you got to put in a little of the human interest part.
But the overwhelming -- the lawyers, the prosecutors, people that are in law enforcement really -- I thought gave the show thumbs up for many many years and because of that -- the fact that it's close -- there are other good shows that were on, NYPD Blue, and Homicide, they just -- I think they get too much into the personal lives, and they really lose grip of what Law & Order really is.
By Kitteridge
Few shows rely on police and legal accuracy like Law & Order does, which means they need to ask experts in the field when it comes time to get down to the nitty gritty. Mike Struk, a former NYPD homicide and narcotics detective for 20 years, is their man, and he's been with the show since its first episode, all the way back. Currently, he runs a private detective agency in New Jersey, but as he tells apocrypha, he's always got his beeper set to "on," in case of emergencies. apocrypha sat down with L&O's police advisor and got down to details pretty fast.
Is there more than one police advisor for the show?
No, I'm the official guy. I've been with the show since the very first episode. I've done the whole thing with them. I'm retired from the NYPD, I was a detective in New York City, through various assignments -- narcotics and homicide squad, etcetera.
How many years?
Twenty years to the minute.
You got out as soon as you could!
(laughs) I was standing there when the clock hit 12.
Twenty years is enough?
Oh, yeah. It was fun, I had a great, great time, but I was young enough to start over and not many people have the opportunity to retire at 41, so I thought, 'Let me go take a shot.'
And how did you get involved with L&O in the first place?
One of the writers [David Black] brought me to the show -- he had written a book on a major murder case I was involved in in July of 1980. I don't know if you remember the Met Murder case -- it had a great amount of notoriety. It was a violinist who got grabbed backstage at the Metropolitan Opera, and we had about four or five weeks to solve the case, and it was a situation where the gal had been pulled into the bowels of the building by a stagehand and thrown off the roof, and it was carried front page on the [New York] Times for a while.
And that's rare -- usually they don't put that smut on the front page, at least not that often. So he wrote a book for myself and this other detective, and I guess you could say maybe his first book was the exposure, and he was a gentleman. It kind of opened the doors for him, and he went on to do some writing for Hill Street Blues, Miami Vice and a lot of other projects since then. And he came on board to Law & Order and he was brought on in the initial crew as a writer, and he brought me on.
Not a bad second career.
Yeah, I'm not driving a Porsche, but it's been great fun.
When you first started early on, how much did you contribute to the actual authenticity of the show?
Well, probably in a greater way than I am today because a lot of the writers today are seasoned hairbags themselves. I feel like some of them are detectives I worked with in the homicide squad. They were just making many many scripts early on, and grooming the script was quite a job. Although a lot of them did a lot of research and spoke to peripheral people, but to enhance the script or to the get the script better early on was a lot of work early on, and now they've all developed writing styles and things are in place and it's a lot easier for me today.
Can you think of an example early on of something they missed that you made sure you had fixed?
To think of one specific thing that makes me laugh -- everything from how to wear a gun to why to wear a gun to how many guns to why to arrest people and you name it. Just picture yourself as the layman, writing a story about police officers and the law and the rules and the regulations they have to adhere to. It's just not that easy, whether you're a writer or not.
How important was it and is it to the show to get that kind of thing right?
I can only speculate and speak from my own experience, but I currently run a small investigations business, and it brings me -- I wouldn't say throughout the world, but I have traveled in other countries and throughout the United States and of course all over the Eastern seaboard, and my job brings me into many municipalities and police stations and prosecutors' offices and usually my test for the show is after I've done business with these people and have an opportunity to say near the end of whatever my business was, "By the way, did you guys ever see Law & Order?"
And I would come out right from the blue, and nobody knows I had anything to do with it, and really solicit honest opinions from people. And 97--98% of the comments over all these years have always been genuinely upbeat for the show. And I'd hear, "That's a pretty good show, it's close, it's kind of like the real thing," and then I would tell them, don't forget, it is a commercial product, and if they told it exactly like it was, we'd all be snoring. So you got to put in a little of the human interest part.
But the overwhelming -- the lawyers, the prosecutors, people that are in law enforcement really -- I thought gave the show thumbs up for many many years and because of that -- the fact that it's close -- there are other good shows that were on, NYPD Blue, and Homicide, they just -- I think they get too much into the personal lives, and they really lose grip of what Law & Order really is.