|
Post by Patcat on May 6, 2005 12:31:08 GMT -5
Major spoilers are at thereelvincentdonofrio.com site.
All I can say is:
OH MY GOD
Patcat (and it is a major spoiler)
|
|
|
Post by NikkiGreen on May 6, 2005 12:55:42 GMT -5
WOW! That certainly is one major spoiler.
|
|
|
Post by Metella on May 6, 2005 13:04:42 GMT -5
.... and it pisses me off. what a crutch. what a cop out. what a lack of vision. pathetic.
That really does it for me. I don't give a crap about this show over any other form of entertainment, including doing my dishes. It just crossed my line.
|
|
|
Post by missymagoshi on May 6, 2005 13:11:33 GMT -5
Yuck. Stupid. A definate total cop out. And I don't get it. How can part of an un-aired script be on that site? How does something like that work? Where did they get it from, an insider or an actor who was on the show?
|
|
|
Post by romulanavatra3 on May 6, 2005 13:22:06 GMT -5
intresting so logan is in a few scenes with goren and eames(wonder if they will have do that with all the episodes). cant wait till season 5 starsts in oz(we may be waiting a while). reagrds rom.
|
|
|
Post by romulanavatra3 on May 6, 2005 13:30:51 GMT -5
.... That really does it for me. I don't give a crap about this show over any other form of entertainment, including doing my dishes. It just crossed my line. granted mettela but dont worry hopefully they will finally get rid of her and then it will be back to decent, i mean i can sort of understand in a way why beacuse the episode wher they had that stupid choice, the ending they chose left a big open gap and it proabbly needs one more thing to final end the mini saga( inside the series tht is ). i mean yes bad but i have a feeling about this that someting tells me she will be gone very soon(please, please let that be true). but mettela as for your reaction a little harsh untill you actually see the episode, let alone the season. on a brighter note it is somewhat intresting that loagn appears so maybe they going for a simmilar fomat to svu but with more even divison of cases(unlike svu where benson and unstable hog most of the action while fin and munch twidle their colective thumbs and make snmart ass remarks). reagrds rom.
|
|
|
Post by Patcat on May 6, 2005 13:35:51 GMT -5
The managers of the Reelsite have proved very reliable in the past--I'm not sure of their sources, but clearly they're good ones, and I respect that.
I, too, think Nicole has outstayed her welcome and hope someone ends her for good. But I was highly unsatisfied with her potential end in GREAT BARRIER, and hope, if this is it, it packs more punch.
And I do find the fact she's posing as a librarian, one who's apparently trying to influence a young person, very intriguing in light of the fact Bobby's mother was a libarian.
Patcat
|
|
|
Post by Metella on May 6, 2005 14:09:29 GMT -5
Rom: they could shoot her dead in the first scene ... they just have gone too far. If they want to dabble in brainless serial ober-drama; they can; but they have lost my support and my admiration.
You can't go back to decent once you have sold your soul for ratings.
The great barrier episode pushed it to the limit of any type of believability - now it is just ridiculous and I am not engaged with Goren or Eames anymore; they are just part of a dramatic cop show now. I may actually not even watch it anymore.
That is from a dude that spent many hundred to own all sorts of D'Onofrio related works/items.
What's that song? The thrill is gone .....
I think the people at the reel site would only put things up they are pretty sure of - so I don't doubt this is at least a draft script; even if it is not a final version. They take pride in their site & it shows.
I think after discussions about this are over, I may only check in for the off topic discussions - since I like YOU guys too much to not visit here.
|
|
|
Post by trisha on May 6, 2005 14:43:57 GMT -5
Humph. You guys made me look and I'm sorry for it.
Why is Nicole so lame? I don't get it. These are the same writers who brought us so many other good villains. Why is Nicole, the supposed super-villain, so pale in comparrison with characters like Connie from Sound Bodies, and the guy from The Pardoners Tale. These were really untouchable villains, and left us wanting more. Maybe it's because we never see them again so there's something left for the mind to chew on.
|
|
|
Post by NikkiGreen on May 6, 2005 15:22:55 GMT -5
Good suggestion, Rom. I'll wait until the episode airs. We all knew she'd be back. The storyline needs to be resolved one way or another. Maybe Logan will take her out and endear himself to the Logan haters!
|
|
|
Post by domenicaflor on May 6, 2005 21:36:06 GMT -5
I was and was not surprised. I voted for Elizabeth/Nicole to die, because I thought that it was the natural and logical progression to her character. Bobby learned from his mistakes - in "Great Barrier" she could not affect him anymore. *SHE* was the loose cannon at the end of that episode, not Goren.
But since TPTB respected the outcome of the US vote, I knew that they would bring her back again in some form. If the show is written well, I will watch and enjoy it. I agree with the others that this time needs to be the last - I don't think there is any more damage that her character can legitimately do. If she escapes AGAIN than it will cross the line to implausibility to me.
Rom, I love your characterization of UnStable(r) on SVU. Great pun. I was positing the idea to a friend the other day that maybe this is another reason that Goren is more subdued this season - so that Stabler is the only out-of-control male detective on the franchise.
D.
|
|
|
Post by NicoleMarie on May 8, 2005 0:05:10 GMT -5
Ok, someone tell me why I had to (compulsively) look too? Logan and Nicole in a single show? Does CI have it in for me or what? As for the absurdity of Nicole, I'm with Metella!! Maybe this time Nicole will really, actually, finally die. Maybe this show will be the only one worth watching this season. Then again, I got burned three times already and I don't want to fetch the fourth bone they throw! Ah, descions, descions! ;D Metella, don't blame D'Onofrio for Nicole! Unless it was his idea too. In that case, one big cyber slap for D'Onofrio! Isn't he friends with the actress that plays Nicole? (What the hell is her real name?!) We all knew she'd be back. The storyline needs to be resolved one way or another. Maybe Logan will take her out and endear himself to the Logan haters! Not me! I would kiss the feet of whoever finally decides to kill her off though...
|
|
|
Post by Metella on May 9, 2005 6:58:06 GMT -5
I don't blame the actors & maybe not even the writers if they were instructed to construct this next episode. I blame those who sold their creative souls for ratings. Is it Wolf? Is it Balcer? I don't know & for me it is unimportant in this matter; my favorite show has jumped the shark & I have no patience with the ones to blame as they should have seen it and should have let her live per the votes but not brought her back - or just spoke of her being caught in South Africa or something.
|
|
|
Post by BegToDiffer on May 9, 2005 14:38:16 GMT -5
As much as I want Nicole gone, to have Logan be the one to finally "get her" would be such an insult to Goren and Eames. They do all the work, and Logan, of all people, would get the glory?? I would be sick for a very long time if they went that route. And, I would resent Logan even more. If Nicole gets away again, we will have to rename LOCI. It could be called the Desperate Detectives or maybe Desperate Writers. At that point, I'll be hanging out with Metella.
|
|
|
Post by Techguy on May 9, 2005 15:12:36 GMT -5
Vote or no vote, the CI writers should leave well enough alone. Nicole went out the window in "Great Barrier" and I was hoping only a mention of her would be made in a future episode. My reaction to this upcoming Season 5 episode is YUCK! And if Nicole's return is timed to reap high ratings vs. "Desperate Housewives" or November sweeps, then double YUCK. No, make that triple YUCK! The only hope I have left is, this will be the final chapter. Please let it be so.
|
|